Could the GOP impeach Obama for ending the Bush tax cuts? (The Week)

New York ? Though liberals are scoffing, that’s the threat from Grover Norquist, the anti-tax activist who has essentially been setting the GOP’s tax policy

Grover Norquist, the head of Americans for Tax Reform, raised plenty of eyebrows on Saturday with an interview he gave to National Journal, in which he said that if President Obama is foolish enough to let all the “Bush tax cuts” expire at the end of the year, “Republicans will have enough votes in the Senate in 2014 to impeach.” The anti-tax activist holds a lot of sway over the GOP, with almost all House Republicans and every GOP presidential candidate signing his no-tax pledge, but impeachment is reserved for “treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors,” notes Tanya Somanader in Think Progress. So “suggesting Republicans impeach the president over tax cuts is wildly outlandish.” Right?

There’s no way the GOP’s that crazy: Norquist is just plain “nuts,” says Nicole Belle in Crooks and Liars. And even with “idiots and clowns” running the Grand Old Party these days, “there’s no way that the Republicans will go down this route.” Impeaching over tax policy stretches the Constitution to the breaking point, and won’t win any favors with voters, either. “You may think you rule Washington,” Grover, but this idea is “just delusional.”
“Norquist threatens impeachment if Obama does not extend Bush tax cuts”

Norquist was only speaking figuratively: I imagine these impeachment musings are just one of those “brief bouts of hyperbole” Norquist indulges in when he strays from his laser focus on “tax sanity,” says Jazz Shaw in Hot Air. If he was seriously suggesting impeachment for “allowing a legally passed set of tax cuts with a built in expiration date to lapse,” somebody needs to press him on it. But either way, Norquist should probably stick to pushing lower taxes and spending.
“Norquist: Impeach Obama over taxes?”

Never underestimate conservative activists: I have to admit I’m “a little less sanguine than most people when I hear that Grover Norquist is going on about” impeachment, says Charles Pierce in Esquire. Conservatives Republicans have been “thinking, and then acting on, the unthinkable” for years. And remember, they impeached Bill Clinton on almost equally dubious grounds, because they had the votes. So “if you don’t think they won’t try this farce again, elect them majorities in both houses and see what happens.”
“The Grover Norquist ‘impeach Obama’ fantasy”

View this article on TheWeek.com
Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

Other stories from this topic:

Like on Facebook?-?Follow on Twitter?-?Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/oped/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/theweek/20120130/cm_theweek/223834

kourtney kardashian pregnant again apple juice apple juice carole king miranda kerr occupy la adriana lima

Patrick Wallace: Adopted by Two Gay Dads After a Tumultuous Upbringing, 15-Year-Old Zac Shares a Letter of Love (Huffington post)

Dan Walters: Are tax increases a solution to California’s woes, or a downer? (Sacramento Bee)

Italy’s Monti reviews finances before EU meetings (Reuters)

ROME (Reuters) ? Newly installed Prime Minister Mario Monti got straight to work at the weekend, reviewing Italy’s parlous finances before a round of meetings in coming days with European leaders to discuss the growing euro zone debt crisis.

Monti easily won confidence votes in record time in both houses of parliament last week, just days after his predecessor Silvio Berlusconi lost his majority and quit — the latest EU premier to fall victim to the Europe-wide economic emergency.

The new government of technocrats, supported by almost all Italy’s main parties, will focus first on enacting austerity measures passed by Berlusconi that aim to balance the budget in 2013 and halt the rise in Italy’s monumental debt pile.

But with the economy looking certain to slow, additional measures will be needed and Monti, who is also economy minister, spent his first hours in office reviewing the latest data.

Italian newspapers said on Sunday that new budget measures were likely to be unveiled within two weeks, with a property tax abolished by Berlusconi set to return, plus moves to tackle tax evasion and a cut in payroll taxes to lift employment.

As the broad outlines of his program emerge, Monti will travel to Brussels on Tuesday for talks with Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council, and Jose Manuel Barroso, president of the European Commission.

On Thursday he will have lunch in Strasbourg with French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Europe’s two main powerbrokers showed growing exasperation with Berlusconi, believing he had failed to grasp the severity of the crisis, and there was obvious relief in Paris and Berlin over the arrival of Professor Monti, a former EU commissioner.

“Up until now Italy was part of the problem, now it is part of the solution,” said Daniel Gros, the head of the Center for European Policy Studies in Brussels.

EUROBOND DIVISIONS

But Monti will find himself at odds with Merkel over ways out of Europe’s financial crisis, which has roiled markets and raised fears for the future of the euro single currency.

While Germany has rejected calls for common euro zone debt issuance, Monti enthusiastically endorsed the measure before taking office, writing in the Financial Times in July that eurobonds “are the only answer to Europe’s crisis.”

He is only likely to make headway on this issue if he can show Europe that he has a firm grasp on Italy’s finances and a clear vision of how to cut its debt, currently running at a perilous 120 percent of gross domestic product.

Although he secured huge support in last week’s vote from a parliament spooked by a sudden jump in Italian borrowing costs, he could face a battle as he tries to win backing for greater austerity or implementing a pledge to liberalize the hidebound economy.

Berlusconi said on Sunday he expected Monti to stay in office until the end of the legislature in 2013. While he was ready to back a new property tax, Berlusconi warned that other measures, such as a mooted wealth tax, were not acceptable.

“The government is made up of highly competent technocrats. That does not mean they have carte blanche on everything. We will be very attentive on every single measure,” he told Corriere della Sera newspaper.

“Monti cannot ignore us. (My party) is the biggest party in parliament and will be an irreplaceable point of reference for this government,” he added.

(Editing by Tim Pearce)

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/europe/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111120/bs_nm/us_italy

kinect lockerz online jobs anne boleyn anderson silva ayrton senna dallas cowboys

A GOP debt plan would hit some popular tax breaks (AP)

WASHINGTON ? Millions of taxpayers who take advantage of deductions for mortgage interest, charitable donations and state and local taxes would be targeted for potential tax hikes under a GOP plan to raise taxes by $290 billion over the next decade to help reduce the nation’s deficit.

Some workers could also see their employer-provided health benefits taxed for the first time, though aides cautioned that the proposal is still fluid.

The plan by Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., who serves on the 12-member debt supercommittee, would raise revenue by limiting the tax breaks enjoyed by people who itemize their deductions, in exchange for lower overall tax rates for families at every income level. Taxpayers who already take the standard deduction instead of itemizing ? about two-thirds of filers ? could see tax cuts. The one-third of taxpayers who itemize their deductions might find themselves paying more.

The top income tax rate would fall from 35 percent to 28 percent, and the bottom rate would drop from 10 percent to 8 percent. The rates between would be reduced as well.

About 50 million households itemized their deductions in 2009, according to the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation. About 35 million households claimed the mortgage interest deduction, and 36 million deducted charitable donations. Nearly 41 million claimed deductions for paying state and local taxes.

A GOP congressional aide said the plan is designed to raise taxes on households in the top two tax brackets. That would affect individuals making more than $174,400 and married couples making more than $212,300.

Some Republicans say the plan offers a potential breakthrough in deficit-reduction talks that have stalled over GOP opposition to tax hikes and Democrats’ objection to cuts in benefit programs without significant revenue increases.

But Republicans are becoming increasingly divided over the issue of raising taxes. A growing number of Republicans in Congress say they would support a tax reform package that increases revenues, if it is coupled with significant spending cuts, enough to reduce the deficit by about $4 trillion over the next decade.

The so-called “go big” strategy has been endorsed by a bipartisan group of about 150 lawmakers from the House and Senate. A rival group of 72 House Republicans sent a letter to the supercommittee Thursday, urging members to oppose any tax increases.

“We must recognize that increasing the tax burden on American businesses and citizens, especially during a fragile recovery, is irresponsible and dangerous to the health of the United States,” said the letter, circulated by Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C.

Democrats, meanwhile, have panned Toomey’s plan, saying the rate reductions would cut taxes for the wealthy so much that taxes on the middle class would have to be raised. They also argue that Toomey’s plan would generate less revenue than advertised.

They note that Toomey’s plan assumes that tax cuts enacted under former President George W. Bush, and extended through 2012 under President Barack Obama, would continue. Toomey’s plan would then cut the tax rates even more.

The supercommittee has a Wednesday deadline to come up with a plan to reduce government borrowing by at least $1.2 trillion over the next decade. If the panel fails, $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts to domestic and military programs would take effect in 2013.

Some details of Toomey’s plan remain in flux, in part because he is open to changes to help forge an agreement, said the GOP aide, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private negotiations. The aide confirmed that Toomey’s plan is closely modeled after a proposal by three experts at the National Bureau of Economic Research, a private research organization perhaps best known for deciding when recessions begin and end.

The three experts are Martin Feldstein, a Harvard University professor who was President Ronald Regan’s chief economic adviser; Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget; and Daniel Feenberg, a research associate at the bureau.

Under their plan, the tax benefits from itemizing deductions and excluding employer-provided health insurance from taxable income would be limited to 2 percent of taxpayer’s adjusted gross income.

That means if a taxpayer has an adjusted gross income of $50,000, deductions and exemptions could reduce his or her tax bill by a maximum of $1,000.

Taxpayers who face limits on their tax breaks could opt to take the standard deduction instead. Currently, about one-third of tax filers itemize their deductions. The rest claim the standard deduction, which in 2011 is $5,800 for individuals and $11,600 for married couples filing jointly.

The plan envisions millions of additional taxpayers switching to the standard deduction, which would simplify their returns, MacGuineas said.

Policymakers across the political spectrum agree the federal tax code is too complicated, and most agree on a basic formula for simplifying it: Reduce tax breaks and use the additional revenue to lower the overall tax rates for everyone.

There is little agreement, however, on which tax breaks to target.

Toomey’s plan attempts to sidestep debates over which tax breaks to target and instead proposes to limit taxpayers’ overall ability to reduce their tax bills.

“This is a far more practical way to start to scale back the influence and costs of tax expenditures in the code by kind of glopping them together and capping them,” MacGuineas said. “You’re not picking the winners and losers.”

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/uscongress/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111117/ap_on_go_co/us_debt_supercommittee_taxes

apple computer pancreatic cancer steve jobs aapl stock aapl stock apple ii pixar